Hill v. Director of Corrections et al
| Kenneth Hill |
| Director of Corrections, J. Walker, UC Davis, S. Menon, J. Bal and V. Duc |
| 2:2011cv03409 |
| December 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Kings |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/12/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court shall randomlyassign a United States District Judge to this action. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment 47 be granted; Judgment be entered in defendants' favor; and the Clerk directed to close this case. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/7/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs motion to amend (ECF No. 36 ) is denied and the Clerk of the Court shall strike the proposed amended complaint (ECF No. 37 ) from the docket. Defendants motion for plaintiffs compliance and amendment thereto (ECF Nos. 40 , 41 ) is granted. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/19/2013 REQUESTING the parties to submit confidential settlement statements, no later than 30 days, as described in this order. (cc: ADR)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/10/13 ORDERING that plaintiffs motion to compel 27 is denied, and defendants motion to compel 26 is granted. Within 21 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall (1) serve defendant s with a signed verification that his interrogatory responses, dated April 23, 2013, were made under oath; (2) serve defendants with further responses to Special Interrogatories, Nos. 7 and 8; and (3) serve signed written responses to defendants Request for Production of Documents. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/2/2013 STRICKING plaintiff's 29 unauthorized pleading; and DENYING plaintiff's 30 motion for attorney's fees. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/20/13 denying 21 Motion to Compel. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/29/13 GRANTING 20 Motion to modify the scheduling order. The deadline for completion of discovery is extended to July 23, 2013 and the deadline for filing dispositive motions is extended to September 23, 2013.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/20/2013 DENYING plaintiff's 18 request for appointmennt of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/07/13 disregarding 15 Motion for discovery and the clerk of the court shall make a notation on the docket to that effect. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/24/12ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Kenneth Hill to the clerk until the balance of $350 is paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders ) (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
