USA v. Approximately $49,360.00 in U.S. Currency et al
| United States of America |
| Approximately $49,360.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $9,166.84 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $4,795.00 in U.S. Currency, Assortment of Jewelry Valued at Approximately $6,100.00, 2006 Maserati Quattroporte, VIN: ZAMCE39A660021662, License Number 5SSH877 and 2004 Dodge Stratus, VIN: 1B3EL36X94N192290, License Number 5ZAT819 |
| 2:2011mc00030 |
| March 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/1/16. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
44
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/11/2015 ORDERING 43 the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 3/14/2016.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
42
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/4/15 ORDERING that the action denominated 2:15-CR-00230 GEB be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set before Judge Burrell in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:15-CR-00230 JAM. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk make the appropriate adjustment in the assignment of criminal cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/10/2015 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture is EXTENDED to 12/14/2015. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATION and ORDER 37 for extension of time signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/9/2015. The deadline by which United State shall file a Complaint for Forfeiture against defendant assets and/or obtain Indictment alleging assest are subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 9/14/2015. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/6/2015 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture is EXTENDED to 6/15/2015. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
34
STIPULATION and ORDER extending time to file complaint for forfeiture in rem and/or to obtain indictment to 12/15/14 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/4/14.(Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER extending time to file a complaint for forfeiture and/or an indictment to 12/15/14 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/9/14. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/16/14 re: 29 EXTENDING Time for Filing a Complaint for Forfeiture and/or to Obtain an Indictment Alleging Forfeiture. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
28
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/19/14: The deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to June 17, 2014. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/2013 ORDERING that the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to 3/19/2014. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/18/2013 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 12/19/2013. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER 21 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/21/13 ORDERING that the deadline for the United States to file a complaint for forfeiture and/or to obtain an indictment alleging forfeiture is EXTENDED to 9/20/2013. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/14/2013 ORDERING that the United States file a Complaint for Forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an Indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture by 6/21/2013. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER 17 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/12; The parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to March 21, 2013. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/11/12 ORDERING the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to December 21, 2012. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER 13 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/12/12 ORDERING that the deadline for the USA to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture is EXTENDED to 9/21/2012. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/22/12 EXTENDING time for filing a Complaint for forfeiture and/or to obtain an Indictment alleging forfeiture. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
10
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/22/11 ORDERING that the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to March 21, 2012. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 9/19/11 ORDERING that the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to December 21, 2011. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
5
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 6/16/11 EXTENDING deadline to September 21, 2011 by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
2
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 3/22/11 ORDERING the deadline by whichthe United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain anindictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject toforfeiture shall be extended to 6/21/11. (Carlos, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
