Vang v. State of California et al
Petitioner: Nou Vang
Respondent: Swarthout and State of California
Case Number: 2:2012cv00159
Filed: January 20, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/27/14 DISMISSING CASE pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
November 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/9/12 ORDERING that any renewed motion for stay and abeyance shall be due 21 days from the date of this order. Should petitioner elect not to file a renewed motion for stay and abeyance by that date, the court will presume that petitioner no longer seeks a stay and the original habeas petition pending before this court will then be screened.(Dillon, M)
July 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/09/12 granting 11 Motion to Proceed IFP and denying 9 Motion to Stay without prejudice to filing a renewed motion for a stay and abeyance pursuant to the Kelly procedure or the Rhines procedure within 30 days of the date of this order. Alternatively, if petitioner has not exhausted any of his claims in state court as is required, he may move to voluntarily dismiss this action without prejudice. (Plummer, M)
March 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/20/2012 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
February 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/1/2012 ORDERING that petitioner has 30 days to file a petition; petitioner shall also submit, within 30 days, an application to proceed ifp or the $5.00 filing fee; and the clerk to send petitioner the forms for filing a habeas corpus petition and ifp application. (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vang v. State of California et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Swarthout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nou Vang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?