Boyd v. Knipp
Petitioner: William Alexander Boyd
Respondent: W. Knipp
Case Number: 2:2012cv00372
Filed: February 14, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/16/2014 ORDERING that petitioner's 45 application for reconsideration of the denial of the certificate of appealability is DENIED without prejudice. (cc: Ninth Circuit) (Yin, K)
May 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/16/2013 RECOMMENDING that respondent's 26 motion to dismiss be granted. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
August 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/19/12 ORDERING that the Findings and Recommendations, 21 are hereby VACATED; Petitioners motion for a stay and abeyance, 3 is VACATED from the courts calendar as moot; Respondents motion to dismiss as barred by the statute of limitations, 13 is VACATED without prejudice as premature; Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioners habeas petition within sixty days from the date of this order. Clerk of the Court shall also serve upon respondents counsel the form Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge.(Dillon, M)
July 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 07/30/12 recommending that petitioner's motion to stay the petition filed on 02/14/12 3 be granted, pursuant to Rhines and this matter be stayed pending state court exhaustion of unexhausted claims currently before the state Supreme Court. Upon adopting of these findings and recommendations, should that occur, petitioner be directed to inform the court within 30 days of any decision by the state Supreme Court o n his pending state court petition. Respondent's motion to dismiss as barred by the statute of limitations, filed on 03/30/12 13 is vacated without prejudice. Motions 3 and 13 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
March 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/21/12 GRANTING 10 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Meuleman, A)
February 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/29/2012 ORDERING petitioner to submit, within 28 days, a completed affidavit to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee; the clerk is to send petitioner an ifp form; respondent to file a response to petitioner's 3 motion for stay within 30 days, thereafter, petitioner will have 21 days to file a reply; and the clerk to serve a copy of this order and the order re consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell) (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd v. Knipp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Alexander Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W. Knipp
Represented By: Jeffrey White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?