United States of America v. Real property located at 705 through 709 South California Street, Stockton, California, San Joaquin County, APN: 149-084-06
| United States of America |
| Real property located at 705 through 709 South California Street, Stockton, California, San Joaquin County, APN: 149-084-06 |
| 2:2012cv00811 |
| March 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
SECOND AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/19/2013. (Krueger, M)
|
|
Filing
41
AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/16/13. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER lifting stay signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/23/13. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/30/13 ORDERING that this matter is STAYED until 4/4/2013. On or before 4/4/13, the parties will advise the court whether a further stay is appropriate. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/5/12: This matter is stayed until February 4, 2013. On or before February 4, 2013, the parties shall advise the court whether a further stay is appropriate. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER 26 for Stay signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/5/2012. This matter is STAYED until 12/6/2012. On or before 12/6/2012, parties will advise Court whether further Stay is appropriate. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER 24 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/6/12 ORDERING this matter STAYED until 11/6/2012. On or before 11/6/20/12, the parties will advise the court whether a further stay is appropriate. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER 22 setting deadline signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/14/2012. An Amended Joint Status Report shall be due on or before 9/5/2012. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER FOR PUBLICATION signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/3/12 GRANTING the USA, publication of this action and arrest, for general circulation, as designated by this Court. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Real property located at 705 through 709 South California Street, Stockton, California, San Joaquin County, APN: 149-084-06 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Christopher Khasigian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Real property located at 705 through 709 South California Street, Stockton, California, San Joaquin County, APN: 149-084-06 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
