Taylor v. Wurth et al
| Robert Taylor |
| Wurth, Doud and D. Quvedo |
| 2:2012cv01230 |
| May 8, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/3/16 GRANTING 45 Motion to Expedite Proceedings RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim; The Court decline to exerc ise jurisdiction over plaintiffs state law claim; The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. REFERRED to Judge Morrison C. England. Objections due within thirty (30) days after being served with these findings and recommendations.(Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/30/15 ADOPTING IN FULL 37 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 31 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within 28 days of service of this order. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/1/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 34 ) is DENIED without prejudice. It is RECOMMENDED that: Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 31 ) be granted, and plaintiff's First Amended Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff be granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within 28 days of adoption of these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/1/14 ORDERING that Defendants motion to dismiss 22 is granted. Plaintiffs complaint, filed May 8, 2012, is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall, within 28 days after the filing date of this order, file and serve an amended complaint.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/21/13 ordering that defendant Doud is dismissed from this action without prejudice. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/14/13 ordering the clerk of the court is directed to send to plaintiff 1 USM-285 form, instruction sheet and a copy of the 05/08/12 complaint to be completed and returned with the notice of submission of documents within 60 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/20/13 ORDERING that within 30 days from the service of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the court the Notice of Submission of Documents and four copies of the endorsed complaint; the Clerk of the Court is directed to provide plaintiff with an endorsed copy of his May 8, 2012 complaint.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Robert Taylor signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/27/2013. CDC is to collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. The Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
