Valdez v. Cate et al
Ricardo Valdez |
Matthew Cate, L.D. Zamora, Lawrence Fong, S. Heatley, R. Galloway, Mourine Ndamuko, K. McLean, Sahir Naseer, Jalal Soltanian-Zadeh, Christopher Smith, Robert Rudas, William Hashimoto and Akintola |
2:2012cv02867 |
November 26, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Amador |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Garland E. Burrell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/28/2020 INFORMING Plaintiff that the court will not respond to future filings in this closed action that are not authorized by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/02/14 ordering that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of no opposition. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/8/13 ORDERING that Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall pay the statutory filing fee of $350. The complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend with in 30 days. The Clerk of the Court shall strike the second amended complaint 11 from this action, and re-file it as a second amended complaint in Valdez v. Cate, No. 2:12-cv-2854. Plaintiffs request for appointment of counsel 3 is DENIED.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/29/12 ordering plaintiff has 30 days from the date of service of this order, to submit either the filing fee or the application required by section 1915(a). The clerk is directed to mail to the plaintiff a form application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.