Haynes v. Rosario et al
| Michael D. Haynes |
| D. Rosario, D. Slupski, J. Peterson and G. Swarthout |
| 2:2012cv03018 |
| December 14, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/3/15 ordering the 11/30/15 jury trial date before the undersigned is vacated. This action is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/13/2015 ORDERING that defendants are relieved from filing a pretrial statement; the pretrial conference set for 9/16/2015 is VACATED; and within 14 days, plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/31/15 granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion for Summary Judgment as follows: Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's excessive force claim against defendant Rosario is denied; and defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted on all remaining claims. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/13/15 ORDERING that Plaintiffs motion for a Rule 56(f) continuance 46 is denied; and Plaintiff is granted 21 days from the date of this order in which to file a declaration in support of his opposition to the motion for summary judgment.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/22/14 granting 36 Motion to modify the scheduling order. Pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before June 19, 2014. In all other respects, the Scheduling Order, dated September 16, 2013, shall remain in full force and effect. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/07/14 ordering the court has reviewed the cases identified by plaintiff (ECF No. 28 at 3), as well as the cases addressed by defendants (ECF No. 30 at 2) and determined that it is inappropriate to relate and reassign such cases to the instant case. Local Rule 123. Therfore, the court declines to do so. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/4/14 ORDERING that in response to 28 Notice, the cases will not be related.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/22/13 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to return the copy of the complaint submitted by plaintiff on December 14, 2012; and within thirty days, plaintiff shall submit to the court the four copies of the complaint required to effect service.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/5/13 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Michael D. Haynes to the clerk until the balance of � 36;350 is paid in full. Theclerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders ). (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
