Sehic v. Anderson et al
| Emir Sehic |
| William Van Anderson and Mayuka S Anderson |
| 2:2012cv03030 |
| December 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/11/15 re 49 Request to Enforce Settlement Agreement: IT IS ORDERED if appropriate following resolution of plaintiff's appeal, defendants may renew their request through the filing of a noticed motion to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/18/13 DENYING 36 Motion to Withdraw; DISMISSING action WITH PREJUDICE. This court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the material terms of the parties' 5/24/13 settlement agreement. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/25/13 ORDERING that Defendants shall serve plaintiff with a copy of the opposition filed on 9/17/13 within seven days of the date of this order; and Plaintiff shall file his reply, if any, on or before 10/8/2013. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/26/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 4/12/13 MOTION to AMEND 18 is DENIED as having been rendered moot by the settlement agreement reached on 5/24/13; Plaintiff's 4/23/13 MOTION for Prel iminary Injunction 19 is DENIED as having been rendered moot by the settlement agreement reached on 5/24/13; Plaintiff's 5/16/13 MOTION to CONTINUED 22 is DENIED as moot; Plaintiff's 6/4/13 MOTION to AMEND 26 is DENIED as improperl y brought in light of the settlement agreement reached on 5/24/13; Within fourteen days of the date of this order Plaintiff shall file either a copy of the parties' signed settlement agreement and Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissa l pursuant thereto or a motion seeking to withdraw from the parties' settlement agreement that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules; and Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this order may result in an order dismissing this action for lack of prosecution. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/13/13 ORDERING that a Telephone Status Conference is SET for 7/26/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Each party may, but is not required to, file and serve a separate status report on or before 7/19/13, of no more than 5 pages addressing the current state of the parties' dispute. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER STTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/22/13: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/29/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Plaintiff shall file and serve his own separate status report on or before 3/15/13 and each defendant shall file and serve their own separate status report on or before 3/22/13. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
