Gregory et al v. City of Vallejo, CA et al
| Erika Gregory and Loren Mollner |
| City of Vallejo, Robert Nichelini, Joseph Kreins and Chase Calhoun |
| 2:2013cv00320 |
| February 20, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/27/15 ORDERING that defendant Chase Calhoun's 117 unopposed motion to seal trial transcript of Sarah Elmossalamy's testimony is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
98
PRELIMINARY JURY INSTRUCTIONS signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/26/2015. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/22/2015 re Tentative Ruling of 70 MOTION IN LIMINE No. 4. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/9/2015 DENYING 55 Motion to Reopen Discovery. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/27/14. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER ON REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENT(S) signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/20/14. Request to seal is DENIED and within 1 day plaintiffs shall file their opposition papers in accordance with this order, redacting only the names of third parties. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
28
AMENDED STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/19/14. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/14/2014 ORDERING Within 30 days of this order, the City of Vallejo shall produce any portion of officer Chase Calhoun's personnel file that relates to the investigation of, and reasons for, his termination. In ordering the production of these documents, the court expresses no opinion concerning their ultimate admissibility, but merely finds, for purposes of discovery, that such documents appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Any responsive documents shall be produced in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined in the stipulated protective order previously entered by the court on 11/22/2013 17 . (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/22/2013. (Michel, G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
