Turner v. Richardson et al
Petitioner: Anthony R. Turner
Respondent: Paul Richardson, David Rosenberg, Steven Basha, Arvid Johnson, Lee Stevens, Steven Mock and Shockley
Case Number: 2:2013cv00454
Filed: March 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Yolo
Presiding Judge: John F. Moulds
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 08/12/22 ADOPTING 94 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court DECLINES to issue COA. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 94 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/06/22 RECOMMENDING that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
June 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/05/2020 ORDERING Petitioner shall, within 30 days after the filing date of this order, file and serve a statement addressing the current status of this case, particularly whether petitioner intends to continue pursuing the pending petition for writ of habeas corpus or requests that the petition be withdrawn and this case be voluntarily closed. (Tupolo, A)
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/04/19 ORDERING that petitioner shall regularly file and serve status reports in this case every 60 days, untilfinal resolution of petitioners claims in the state courts. (Plummer, M)
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/20/2019 ORDERING Petitioner's counsel to file and serve, within 14 days after the filing date of this order, a statement informing the court of the status of Petitioner's CA Supreme Court case and the consequent status of the present case and ORDERING Respondent to file and serve a response within 7 days after the filing of Petitioner's statement. (Henshaw, R)
April 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/19/2018 DENYING 76 Pro Se Motion to Amend. (Henshaw, R)
August 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/9/2016 ORDERING the 7/26/2016 findings and recommendations 73 are WITHDRAWN. Petitioner's traverse, or in the alternative, a motion to amend the petition, shall be filed within 30 days after the CA Supreme Court rules on his petition for review People v. Turner, Cal. Supreme Court Case No. S232272. Petitioner's 69 motion to stay this action is DENIED as moot. (Yin, K)
July 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/25/16 ORDERING Petitioner shall file and serve a statement notifying this court and respondent of a decision by the California Supreme Court in petitioners pending petition for review, People v.Turner, Cal. Supreme Court Case No. S232272, within ten (10) days after the decision is issued. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's second request to stay this action 69 be denied; and petitioner be directed to file and serve his traverse, if any, within 30 days after the district judge adopts these findings and recommendations. MOTION to STAY 69 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
June 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/15/16 ordering respondent shall, within twenty-one days after the filing date of this order, file and serve a response to petitioners motion to stay. Petitioner may, within seven days after servi ce of respondents response, file and serve a reply. The hearing scheduled for August 24, 2016 is vacated; the court will decide the merits of petitioners motion on the papers unless the undersigned later determines that a hearing would be helpful.(Plummer, M) Modified on 6/16/2016 (Plummer, M).
January 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/04/16 ordering petitioner's motion to stay 59 the instant federal habeas proceeding is denied without prejudice. Petitioner's request for leave to file a traverse 59 is granted; petitioner shall file and serve his traverse within 45 days after the filing date of this order. (Plummer, M)
January 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/4/16 DENYING 59 Motion to Stay. Petitioners request for leave to file a traverse, ECF No. 59 , is GRANTED; petitioner shall file and serve his traverse within 45 days after the filing date of this order.(Dillon, M)
June 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/29/15 ordering respondent shall on or before 7/24/15 file and serve a response to petitioner's motion to stay. Petitioner shall on or before 8/07/15 file and serve a reply. The hearing sch eduled for 8/19/15 is vacated; the court will decide the motion on the papers unless the undersigned later determines that a hearing would be helpful. Petitioner's request for an extension of time to file a traverse to the Second Amended Petition will be decided when the court addresses the fully-briefed motion to stay. (Plummer, M)
March 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/03/15 granting 55 Motion for extension of time. Respondent shall have an additional 30 days, to and including 3/23/15, to file a response to petitioner's second amended habeas petition. (Plummer, M)
August 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/9/13 DENYING 29 and 30 Motions; Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on petitioner at the address on ECF No. 29 as well as on petitioners counsel of record. (Dillon, M)
July 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/23/13 DENYING 27 Motion. (Dillon, M)
April 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/23/2013 ORDERING that petitioner's 2 motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED; petitioner's 13 motion for appointment of counsel is GRANTED; the Federal Defender is APPOINTED to represent petitioner; the Clerk shall serve a copy of the petition filed in this action on 2/28/2013, a copy of the 7/21/11 document docketed as a First Amended Petition in case no. 2:10-cv-3424 DAD, and this order on David Porter; petitioner's counsel sh all contact the Clerk's office for copies of documents in this file and in case no. 2:10-cv-3424 DAD; petitioner's petition is DISMISSED with leave to amend within 60 days; petitioner's 7 motion to proceed IFP is DENIED as moot; pe titioner's 8 motion for an order to show cause is DENIED without prejudice; petitioner's 15 motion for an order to show cause is DENIED without prejudice; petitioner's 18 motion to expedite review is DENIED; and petitioner's 19 motion for default judgment is DENIED. (cc: AC, David Porter)(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turner v. Richardson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony R. Turner
Represented By: Stephanie Marie Adraktas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Paul Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Rosenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steven Basha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Arvid Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lee Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steven Mock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Shockley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?