Landslide Communications et al v. State of California et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 27, 2013
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/27/2013 ORDERING Plaintiffs' 25 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and Defendants' 26 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; CASE CLOSED. (Waggoner, D)
|August 16, 2013
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/15/13 ORDERING that the deadline for plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is extended to 8/22/13; opposition and cross-motion due by 9/19/13. (Manzer, C)
|June 17, 2013
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/14/13 ORDERING that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference currently set for 7/8/13 is CONTINUED to 8/5/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A joint status report shall be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing. All other requirements of the Court's 4/11/13 Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference remain in effect. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|May 28, 2013
NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/24/13 ORDERING the court is in receipt of the Notice of Related Cases concerning the above-captioned cases filed 4/15/13. After consideration, the court has determined that it is i nappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so. This order is issued for informational purposes only, and shall have no effect on the status of the cases, including any previous Related (or Non-Related) Case Order of this court. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?