Frazier v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Karrie Ann Frazier |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2013cv00756 |
| April 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Shasta |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Retirement and Survivors Benefits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 5/26/21 GRANTING 38 Defendant's unopposed motion for clarification and GRANTING 40 Plaintiff's motion for correction of a clerical error. Plaintiff is AWARDED an additional $2,125.54, representing 20% of the difference between the amount sought in the initial motion ($16, 457.76) and the amount sought in the reply ($19,114.68). Plaintiff is AWARDED an additional $82.50 in costs. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/6/19 GRANTING in PART 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is AWARDED $13,166.21 in fees and $253.05 in costs, payable to plaintiff within 65 days of the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/30/14 ORDERING that the Defendant has 30 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's MOTION for EAJA fees. Defendant's response is currently due 12/31/14. Defendant will have until 1/30/2015 to file the response. Plaintiff's reply to Defendant's opposition will be due 14 days after Defendant files the opposition. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
22
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/4/2014 RECOMMENDING that the 16 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted; RECOMMENDING that the 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment be denied; RECOMMENDING that this matter be remanded for further processing consistent with this order; RECOMMENDING that the Clerk of Court be directed to enter judgment and close this file; REFERRING this matter to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; ORDERING that any objections be filed within 14 days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/24/13 RE: 17 APPROVING Commissioner's First Extention to Respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/7/13 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; plaintiff shall submit service documents to the USM within 15 days and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted; the USM is directed to serve process within 60 days. (Manzer, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Frazier v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Karrie Ann Frazier | |
| Represented By: | Barbara Marie Rizzo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
