Heram v. United States Government
Ram Heram |
United States Government |
2:2013cv00780 |
April 22, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Troy L. Nunley |
Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/1/2015 DENYING 95 Motion to Stay. This case is CLOSED. Any future filings with this court will be disregarded. No further orders will be issued in this closed case. (Donati, J) |
Filing 89 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/15/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 88 Motion to Stay. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 75 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/18/15 relating this case with member case 2:15-cv-00287 MCE DAD. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 73 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/17/15 ORDERING that 37 Motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED; and VACATING the 2/18/15 hearing on plaintiff's motion to quash IRS summons. IT IS HE REBY RECOMMENDED that the 44 Motion to dismiss plaintiff's first amended complaint be granted; that plaintiff's first amended complaint be dismissed without leave to amend; that plaintiff's second amended complaint, construed as a mo tion to amend be denied; that all other pending motions be denied as moot; and that the Clerk be directed to clse the case. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 62 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/22/2014 VACATING the 10/29/2014 hearing on the defendant's motion to dismiss. (Donati, J) |
Filing 47 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/4/2014 DENYING 43 Plaintiffs Motion for an order shortening time; Motion for Stay and Terminating Sanctions; Motion for Appointment of Counsel 37 , Hearing set for 9/17/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Reader, L) |
Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/31/14 GRANTING 16 Motion for More Definite Statement. Within 14 days of this order plaintiff shall file an amended complaint beraing plaintiff's real name, as provided herein. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff's 27 Motion to Stay and Motion for sanctions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's 31 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/8/2014 GRANTING government's 15 Ex Parte Application for continuance. Status Conference is RE-SCHEDULED for 3/26/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB). The deadline to submit required Status Report is EXTENDED until 14 days prior of new date set for Status Hearing. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 10 ORDER DISCHARGING 8 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/21/2013. No sanctions will be imposed. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 8 ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/16/2013 ORDERING the Status Conference CONTINUED to 1/22/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall supply the US Marshal with all information and documents needed to effect service of process. Within 14 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the US Marshal. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing on or before 10/14/2013 why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to follow court orders. Status Reports (or a joint status report) due by 1/8/2014.(Donati, J) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/15/2013 GRANTING plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Clerk shall sent plaintiff 1 USM-285 form (w/instruction sheet), 1 Summons, a copy of 1 Complaint, this Court's Scheduling Order, the form providing Notice of Magistrate Judge's Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction, Court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program. Plaintiff shall supply U.S. Marshal, w/in 14 days from date Order is filed, all informati on needed to effect service. Within 14 days thereafter, plaintiff shall file a Statement with Court that said documents have been submitted to U.S. Marshal. Clerk directed to serve copy of Order on U.S. Marshal. Failure to complay may result in recommendation that action be dismissed. [cc: US Marshal Services] (Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Heram v. United States Government | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ram Heram | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Government | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.