Fagundes v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al
Patrick Fagundes |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and California Reconveyance Company |
2:2013cv00797 |
April 23, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Placer |
Dale A. Drozd |
Troy L. Nunley |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/21/14 ORDERING that Defendant's 34 motion to intervene is granted. Defendant's 33 motion to expunge notice of lis pendens is granted. Plaintiff's Notice of Pending Action, recorded as DOC-2014-0042052-00, on June 24, 2014, in the Placer County Recorder's Office, against the real property located at 3993 Coldwater Drive, Rocklin, CA 95765, is expunged. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 38 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/5/14 DENYING without prejudice 30 Motion to Vacate. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/8/2013 ORDERING 17 Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED; 19 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; the hearing on defendant's 11 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 8/9/2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd; Plaintiff's opposition to defendant's Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before 7/26/2013; Defendants' reply shall be filed on or before 8/2/2013; 20 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application is DENIED. (Waggoner, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.