MGP Manufacturing LLC v. Vargas
MGP Manufacturing LLC |
Chris Vargas |
2:2013cv00849 |
May 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
El Dorado |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
William B. Shubb |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CONSENT FINAL ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/20/2013 re: 5 Motion for Permanent Injunction; CASE CLOSED. (Waggoner, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MGP Manufacturing LLC v. Vargas | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MGP Manufacturing LLC | |
Represented By: | Todd Matthew Malynn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Chris Vargas | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.