Arias v. Raimondo
| Jose Arnulfo Arias |
| Anthony Raimondo, Luis M. Angelo, Maria D. Angelo and Joe Angelo |
| 2:2013cv00904 |
| May 8, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/29/16 ORDERING the Court has reviewed the stipulation of the parties concerning the stay of execution and enforcement, without bond, of the order assessing costs that was entered by this Court on F ebruary 8, 2016, pending the resolution of the appeal that has been taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from the Courts dismissal of the First Amended Complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the stipulation of the parties as set forth in this document is the Order of this Court on the question of a stay of execution or enforcement of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 62 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/8/2016. Court has reviewed totality of circumstances and finds "the reasons for denying costs are not sufficiently persuasive to overcome the presumption in favor of an award." Plaintiff's 60 Objections are SUSTAINED in part. The 59 Costs Submitted to defendant are GRANTED in amount of $14,498.04. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/15/2015 ORDERING that Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/27/2015 GRANTING defendant Anthony Raimondo's 35 Motion to Dismiss. Court finds plaintiff's FLSA claim remains deficient since plaintiff has failed to demonstrate defendant is an employer pursuant to controlling precedent. Plaintiff has 14 days to amend his Complaint with respect to this claim only. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/5/2014 ORDERING Defendant's 35 Motion to Dismiss and 36 SPECIAL ANTI-SLAPP MOTION to STRIKE are CONTINUED to 9/25/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley, and that all briefing dates be calendared according to the new hearing date. (Waggoner, D) Modified on 8/5/2014 (Krueger, M).
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/25/14 GRANTING 11 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend within 14 days. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/13/2013 ORDERING that all parties will exchange initial disclosures under Rule 26(a) no later than 9/20/2013. (Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
