Mugomoke v. Hazuda, et al
| David Mugomoke |
| Mark Hazuda, Eric Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, Robert S. Mueller, III and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 2:2013cv00984 |
| May 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/11/2014 DENYING 14 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING-IN-PART and DENYING-IN-PART 15 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. This case is REMANDED to USCIS to determine whether plaintiff's actions were lawful in light of plaintiff's arguments based on the UN Charter. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/6/14 ORDERING, the parties to provide simultaneous briefs within 7 days from the date of this order and they should address the jurisdiction question only. The parties may file any responses to the other's brief within 14 days from the date of this order. The briefs should be limited to 10 pages each. The hearing scheduled in this matter on 5/9/14, is continued to 5/29/14, at 2:00 p.m. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/31/14: Defendant has not shown that sufficient basis exists to relate the actions. Therefore, they will not be related. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
