Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Machuca et al
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Ruben Contreras Machuca and Silvia Ochoa Gomez
Case Number: 2:2013cv01228
Filed: June 20, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Cable/Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Silvia Ochoa Gomez, Ruben Contreras Machuca signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/25/14. (Manzer, C)
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/31/14 ORDERING that, within five (5) days after these F&R are filed, plaintiff shall serve a copy of the F&R on defendants by mail at the address where servic e of process was effectuated, or at any more recent address known to plaintiff, and shall forthwith file proof of such service. RECOMMENDING that 19 MOTION for DEFAULT JUDGMENT be GRANTED IN PART. Judgment be entered against defendants jointly and severally in the amount of $4,850.00. The Clerk of Court be directed to vacate all dates and close this case. F&R referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Objections to F&R due Within fourteen (14) days. (Kaminski, H)
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/20/14 CONTINUING the Status Conference to 6/9/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. Status Report due no later than 14 days prior to conference. (Manzer, C)
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/17/13 ORDERING that the November 7, 2013 hearing on plaintiff's motion for default judgment is VACATED. Plaintiff's 9 motion for default judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Kastilahn, A)
September 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/24/2013 ORDERING that the Status Conference set for 9/30/2013 is CONTINUED to 3/21/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. A status report shall be filed fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference. (Zignago, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Machuca et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruben Contreras Machuca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Silvia Ochoa Gomez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Peter Riley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?