Burch v. California Department of Motor Vehicles
Plaintiff: Brian Burch
Defendant: California Department of Motor Vehicles
Case Number: 2:2013cv01283
Filed: June 26, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/17/17 ORDERING for the reasons set forth above, Defendant' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 69 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close this case. CASE CLOSED(Becknal, R)
December 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 68 STIPULATION and ORDER for mental testing and examination pursuant to Rule 35 of the FRCP signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/4/2015. (Zignago, K.)
February 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/3/2015. This matter is REFERRED BACK to District Judge Troy L. Nunley pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). All dates pending before Magistrate Judge Drozd are VACATED. Henceforth cation on documents filed in action shall be 2:13CV-1283 TLN DAD with "PS" designation being eliminated. (Marciel, M)
November 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/7/14 ORDERING that A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is SET for Friday 12/19/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Dozd. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before 12/5/2014, and defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before 12/12/2014. Defendant's 9/26/14 MOTION to COMPEL 35 is DENIED without prejudice to being re-noticed. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
November 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/6/2014 GRANTING 31 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Plaintiff is now proceeding in propria persona. This case is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for all further proceedings in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21). (Donati, J)
December 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER denying 20 Motion to Strike and granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion to Dismiss signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/20/13: Plaintiff shall file his Second Amended Complaint to conform to this order within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burch v. California Department of Motor Vehicles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Burch
Represented By: Gregory Martin Finch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Motor Vehicles
Represented By: Gloria Godinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?