Betts v. CPS, et al.
Plaintiff: Alma Betts
Defendant: CPS and Family Court Services
Case Number: 2:2013cv01486
Filed: July 24, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/12/2014 recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b); and that the Clerk be directed to close this case and vacate all dates; 1 Comp laint filed by Alma Betts referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Any party may file objections to F&Rs within 14 days after being served. Failure to timely file objections may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order.(Waggoner, D)
January 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/3/14: The portion of the Order to Show Cause 4 requiring plaintiff to amend her pleading remains undischarged. Along with a copy of this order, the Clerk of the Court shall also mail plaintiff a copy of the order previously issued on August 9, 2013 3 . On or before February 6, 2014, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint. (Kaminski, H)
October 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/18/13 ORDERING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than 11/30/13 why this case should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute the action and failure to comply with th e court's 3 Order. On or before 11/30/13, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint that addresses the issues raised in 3 the court's screening order. Plaintiff's failure to file the required writing and amended complaint shall c onstitute an additional ground for, and plaintiff's consent to, the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including a recommendation that plaintiff's case be involuntarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b) and Local Rules 110 and 183(a). (Meuleman, A)
August 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/9/13. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff is granted 45 days from the entry of this order to file an amended complaint. Failure to timely file an amended complaint in accordance with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed, and may be construed as plaintiff's consent to such dismissal. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Betts v. CPS, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CPS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Family Court Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alma Betts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?