Walker v. Solano County Jail, et al.,
| Johnathan Walker |
| Aramark and Solano County Jail |
| 2:2013cv01515 |
| July 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/2/2013 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/28/13 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the form Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge; and within 21 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file the form indicating whether he consents, or declines to consent, to the jurisdiction of the undersigned.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/02/13 ordering plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, a properly completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the clerk of the court, or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
