Spencer v. Virga et al
Plaintiff: Thurman Leroy Spencer
Defendant: Timothy Virga, State of California and Eureka C. Daye
Case Number: 2:2013cv01626
Filed: August 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/2/15 ORDERING that plaintiffs motion to extend his time to file objections (ECF No. 32 ) is granted, and he shall have until April 10, 2015, to file objections to the January 26, 2015 findings and recommendations. Defendants reply, if any, shall be filed within seven days thereafter.(Dillon, M)
February 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/24/2015 DENYING as moot plaintiff's 16 motion for extension of time. (Yin, K)
January 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/26/15 ORDERING the clerk randomly assign a District Court judge to this case. U.S. District Court Judge William B. Shubb randomnly assigned to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/22/14 ORDERING that petitioners second amended complaint is now due on or before October 11, 2014.(Dillon, M)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/13/14 ORDERING that petitioners second amended complaint is now due on or before September 12, 2014.(Dillon, M)
July 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Thurman L. Spencer signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/8/2014. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
June 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/26/14 ORDERING that 13 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days to amend. (Dillon, M)
November 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/19/2013 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified trust account statement.(Yin, K)
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/26/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form previously provid ed by the Clerk of Court and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his August 7, 2013 complaint. Plaintiffs failure to comply with this order will result in a recommenda tion that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The court construes plaintiffs September 16, 2013 filing as a notice of change of address. The Clerk of the Court is directed to update plaintiffs address of record to: Thurman Leroy Spencer, T-15088, California Health Care Facility, 7707 Austin Road, Stockton, CA 95215.(Dillon, M)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/19/2013 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a completed affidavit to proceed ifp; the Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp application; and plantiff shall submit, within 30 days, a certified trust account statement. (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spencer v. Virga et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thurman Leroy Spencer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Virga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eureka C. Daye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?