Barker v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
| William Barker |
| California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, State of California and Mark Green |
| 2:2013cv01793 |
| August 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/24/16 ORDERING that the parties' stipulated request to vacate the August 21, 2016 dispositive motion deadline is GRANTED. The Court will reset the dispositive motion deadline, if necessary, in the event that the parties are unable to reach an agreement at the November 9, 2016 mediation.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER AND WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/1/2016 ORDERING the custodian to produce William Barker #P-86703, to testify in USDC at 9:00 A.M. on 11/9/2016 in courtroom #25, before Magist rate Judge Kendall J. Newman; custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. (cc: OTCD-SAC) (3 Certified copies served by mail on CHCF Warden)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/25/16 ORDERING that the joint stipulation to extend the dispositive motion deadline by ninety days, up to and including August 21, 2016, is GRANTED.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/15/15 adopting 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiff's claim against defendant Mark Green in his official capacity is dismissed with prejudice. Defendants' motion to dismiss 19 is otherwise denied. Defendants are directed to file an answer to the remaining claims within twenty days of the date of this order. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/25/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a district judge in this action. It is RECOMMENDED that: Plaintiffs claims under California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51 et seq. and the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54.1 et seq., be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant Mark Green in his o fficial capacity be dismissed with prejudice. Defendants motion to dismiss (ECF No. 19 ) otherwise be denied. Defendants be directed to file an answer to the remaining claims within twenty days of adoption of the these Findings and Recommendations. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/30/14 ORDERING that the parties stipulation to extend the deadline for defendants to respond to plaintiffs amended complaint 15 is granted; and Defendants response is now due on or before November 25, 2014. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/16/14: Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the court the completed Notice of Amendment and an original and one copy of the Amended Complaint. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
