Konkle v. Aerotek, Inc.

Plaintiff: Shirley Konkle
Defendant: Aerotek, Inc.,
Case Number: 2:2013cv01905
Filed: September 13, 2013
Court: California Eastern District Court
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Referring Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 23, 2015 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/22/2015 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice; pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
January 16, 2014 7 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/15/14 re: 6 . (Meuleman, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Konkle v. Aerotek, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shirley Konkle
Represented By: Robert Jeremy Adamson
Represented By: Robert S. Clark, NCAED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aerotek, Inc.,
Represented By: Kelsey Elizabeth Papst
Represented By: Benjamin L. Webster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?