Just v. Cochran
| Jeremy Just |
| B. Gower, Jeffrey Beard, Pat Cochran and Keith Franklin |
| 2:2013cv01988 |
| September 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Allison Claire |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/22/14 ORDERING the clerk of the court shall assign this case to a District Judge. U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that pursuant to Local Rule 183(b), this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute; and defendants' pending motions 31 and 32 be denied as moot. Motions 31 and 32 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/9/14 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, or a statement of no opposition, to the Motion To Dismiss. Failure to comply will be deemed as consent to have the (a) pending motion granted, (b) action against defendants Cochrane, Beard and Gower dismissed for lack of prosecution, and (c) action against defendants Cochrane, Beard and Gower dismissed based on plaintiffs failure to comply with these rules and a court order. Said failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); Plaintiffs request for the appointment of an investigator 33 is DENIED without p rejudice; Plaintiffs request for the compelled production of documents 33 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is DENIED insofar as it seeks compelled production from defendants at this time. However, construed as a Rule 56(d) motion to defer decision on defendants summary judgment motion, it is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted 60 days from the date of this order to file an opposition, or a statement of no opposition, to the summary judgment motion.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/23/2014 VACATING defendants' 27 motion to dismiss; and defendants may, within 14 days, bring a motion for summary judgment on administrative exhaustion; defendants may, within 14 days, re-file that portion of the vacated motion brought pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) in a separate motion or in a combination with any motion for summary judgment regarding exhaustion of administrative remedies. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/11/14 denying 24 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/25/13 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Jeremy Just to the clerk until the balance of $350 is p aid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders )(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/4/2013 DISMISSING, without prejudice, plaintiff's 8 application to proceed IFP ; the Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp application; and plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days, a completed ifp application. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
