Melikyan v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Manuel Melikyan
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2013cv02184
Filed: October 18, 2013
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 STIPULATION and ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT of attorney fees signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/28/15: (Kaminski, H)
September 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/25/2015 ORDERING that the Commissioner's 24 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
April 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/23/15 re 24 Motion to Amend the Judgment filed by Commissioner of Social Security. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an opposition, or a statement of non-opposition, no later than 5/26/15; and Defendant shall file her reply, if any, no later than 6/9/15. (Meuleman, A)
March 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/23/2015. Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Commissioner's 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. This matter is REMANDED to Commissioner of Social Security for immediate payment of benefits. (Marciel, M)
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/12/2015 ORDERING the defendnt to file her Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to 15 Motion for Summary Judgment by 2/25/2015. (Michel, G)
December 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/5/14: Plaintiff shall show cause in writing within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (Kaminski, H)
November 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/25/2013 ORDERING 3 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; Clerk is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases; Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of th is order on the USM; within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit all service documents to USM; USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (cc: USM via interoffice mailbox) (Waggoner, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Melikyan v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manuel Melikyan
Represented By: Jesse S. Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?