Matlock v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Jack Matlock |
United Healthcare Services, Inc. |
2:2013cv02206 |
October 22, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/23/2020 ORDERING that cases 2:13-cv-02206-MCE-EFB, 2:14-cv-01792-MCE-EFB and 2:20-cv-01129-WBS-CKD are RELATED. the action denominated 2:20-cv-01129-WBS-CKD is REASSIGNED to Sen ior District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. and to Chief Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. The caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:20-cv-01129-MCE-EFB. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 56 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/15/19. The parties are directed to notify the Court within thirty (30) days following a further decision from the FCC, and shall in any event issue a joint status report as to the status of these proceedings not later than six (6) months after the date this Order is electronically filed.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 37 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/29/15 ORDERING that the Court is in receipt of the parties' Joint Status Report filed January 12, 2015. Based on the parties' representations that Defendant's Petition for Dec laratory Ruling remains pending before the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"), this case shall remain stayed. Not later than ninety (90) days following the date this Order is electronically filed, the parties are directed to file another Joint Status Report advising the Court of the status of the proceedings before the FCC. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 35 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/29/14 ORDERING the Court has considered United Healthcare Services, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Consolidate and Stay and the parties' submissions and that Motion is GRANTED. According ly, it is ORDERED that this matter is CONSOLIDATED with Matlock v. United Healthcare Services, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-02206-MCE-EFB, and that the consolidated action is STAYED pending resolution of United's Petition currently pending before the Feder al Communications Commission. The parties in both cases comprising this consolidated action are ordered to file a joint status report in compliance with the Courts order electronically filed in the Matlock action on October 14, 2014 (ECF No. 34 ). (Becknal, R) |
Filing 34 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/14/2014 ORDERING 33 that this case shall remain STAYED. Not later than 90 days following the date this Order is electronically filed, the parties are directed to file another Joint Status Report advising the Court of the status of the proceedings before the FCC. (Reader, L) |
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/3/14 ORDERING that the action denominated 2:14-cv-01792 JAM DAD, Andy Humphrey v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. is REASSIGNED to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are VACATED. The Clerk is to issue an Order Requiring Joint Status Report. The caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:14-cv-01792-MCE-EFB. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 30 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/24/14 ORDERING that this case shall remain STAYED. Not later than ninety (90) days following the date this Order is electronically filed, the parties are directed to file another Joint Status Report advising the Court of the status of the proceedings before the FCC.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/19/2014 ORDERING 8 that Defendant's Motion to Stay is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 18 pending Motion to Certify Class, currently set for hearing on 5/29/2014, is DENIED wi thout prejudice to renewal at such time as this stay is lifted. Not later than 90 days following the date this Order is electronically filed, the parties are directed to file a Joint Status Report advising the Court of the status of the proceedings before the FCC. (Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Matlock v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jack Matlock | |
Represented By: | Todd M. Friedman |
Represented By: | Seyed Abbas Kazerounian |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United Healthcare Services, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Neil R. O'Hanlon |
Represented By: | David William Skaar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.