Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Alex Bailey
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2013cv02281
Filed: November 1, 2013
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/16/15 re: 24 APPROVING AND ORDERING that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. (Meuleman, A)
March 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/30/15 GRANTING Plaintiff's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING Defendant's 21 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The matter is REMANDED for further consideration. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/10/14. Defendant is granted an extension of time to file motion for summary judgment. Motion due within 30 days. (Manzer, C)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/24/14: Plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment is hereby extended to the new filing date of May 28, 2014. (Kaminski, H)
April 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/1/14 ORDERING that the Plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended to the new filing date of April 28, 2014. (Becknal, R)
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/5/2013 GRANTING 3 Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in Social Security cases. The Cl erk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM an original and five (each) copies of the completed summons, copies of th e complaint, and copies of the scheduling order, and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (cc: USM) (Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alex Bailey
Represented By: Peter Brixie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Jeffrey T Chen
Represented By: Bobbie J. Montoya, ss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?