Ridge Top Ranch, LLC v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service et al
Plaintiff: |
Ridge Top Ranch, LLC |
Defendant: |
United States Fish & Wildlife Service and Daniel M. Ashe |
Case Number: |
2:2013cv02462 |
Filed: |
November 26, 2013 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Office: |
Sacramento Office |
County: |
Sacramento |
Presiding Judge: |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Presiding Judge: |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Nature of Suit: |
Environmental Matters |
Cause of Action: |
16 U.S.C. ยง 1538 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
March 4, 2014 |
Filing
33
ORDER denying 10 Motion for Preliminary Injunction signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/3/14. (Kaminski, H)
|
February 19, 2014 |
Filing
31
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/19/2014 ORDERING that a responsive pleading be filed within twenty-eight (28) days of the Court's ruling on the 10 Motion for Preliminary Injunction or within twenty-eight (28) days of the filing of any amended complaint. (Michel, G)
|
February 3, 2014 |
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/3/2014 ORDERING 21 Order is AMENDED as follows: paragraph at lines 13:27 - 14:11 are STRICKEN and REPLACED with a paragraph that reads: What remains is that portion of the proposed preliminary injun ction which would enjoin the defendants from taking any action that would directly or indirectly grant approval for Caltrans and/or the [STA] to obtain the mitigation described in the [RFP], including habitat mitigation for the California red-legged frog, from any source other than Ridge Top. (Proposed Order 2.) It would be proper for the court to enter an injunction in nearly this form, omitting only the words other than Ridge Top. If the court were to enter this injunction, FWS would be unabl e to approve either the Ridge Top Proposal or any other proposal until the court reached a determination on the merits of Ridge Tops claims. Such relief would preserve the status quo pending a determination on the merits, and as such, appears appropriate. (Waggoner, D)
|
January 31, 2014 |
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/31/2014 DIRECTING Defendants to file a sur-reply by 2/7/2014 at 4:30p and SETTING 10 MOTION for PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION for Hearing on 2/21/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Donati, J)
|
January 24, 2014 |
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/23/2014 ORDERING 10 That the hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction is VACATED. An order will be forthcoming. (Reader, L)
|
January 7, 2014 |
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/6/2014 ORDERING, for administrative reasons, 10 Motion Hearing RESET for 1/31/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; deadline for filing a reply, if any (1/6/2014) remains unchanged. (Waggoner, D)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?