Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Lois Martin |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2013cv02671 |
| December 30, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/06/16 granting 30 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is awarded $5,830.85 in attorney fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d); and Defendant shall determine whether plaintiffs EAJA attorn eys fees are subject to anyoffset permitted under the United States Department of the Treasurys Offset Program and, if thefees are not subject to an offset, shall honor plaintiffs assignment of EAJA fees and shall causethe payment of fees to be made directly to plaintiffs counsel pursuant to the assignment executedby plaintiff. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/29/2015 DENYING 28 Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/28/2015 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 15 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Defendant's 22 cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED. This matter is REMANDED with instructions to award benefits. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/27/2015 ORDERING the defendant to respond to the 15 Motion for Summary Judgment by 4/6/2015; MODIFYING the Court's Scheduling Order accordingly. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER 17 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/3/2015. Defendant's time to respond to plaintiff's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 3/6/2015. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/5/2015 ORDERING that plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment is EXTENDED to 1/6/2015. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/1/14 ORDERING that 3 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue process and to serve upon plaintiff the undersigneds Scheduling Order and Order re Consent or Request for Reassignment for social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order upon the United States Marshal. (copy served on USM) (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lois Martin | |
| Represented By: | Jesse S. Kaplan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
