Johnson v. Alnager et al
Michael Odis Johnson |
Spearman, R. J. Rackley, Summers, J. Truett, P. Marziello, P. Mullen, V. M. Alnager and Abu |
2:2014cv00401 |
February 6, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Morrison C. England |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/15/14 recommending that the second amended complaint 12 be dismissed and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/7/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff' s first amended complaint (ECF No. 10 ) is dismissed; and Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to file a second amended complaint(Dillon, M) |
Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Michael Odis Johnson signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/25/2014. CDCR is to collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and for ward to the Clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.