Hoffman v. Quach, et al.
Pierre L. Hoffman |
Truong Quach, Martha Jolley, Dixie Harper, Phillip Mallory and Allan Jennings |
2:2014cv01009 |
April 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
San Joaquin |
Dale A. Drozd |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/3/2017 DENYING 27 Pre-Trial Motion; DENYING 34 Motion for Court Order; GRANTING 35 Motion for Extension of Time; DEEMING 38 Opposition timely filed; RECOMME NDING that the 32 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case; REFERRING this matter to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; ORDERING that any objections be filed and served within fourteen days. (Michel, G.) |
Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/30/15 DENYING 20 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Pierre L. Hoffman signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/26/2015. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.