Lena v. Davis, et al.
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 19, 2015
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/19/15 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' 02/10/15 motion to dism iss 50 be granted. Plaintiff's remaining claims for denial of access to courts against defendants Davis, Wilson, and Foulk be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and this case be closed. MOTION to DISMISS 50 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|May 11, 2015
ORDER denying 62 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/11/15. (Plummer, M)
|December 5, 2014
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/05/14 ordering that the motion filed by plaintiff on 11/24/14 35 is denied without prejudice. (Plummer, M)
|October 15, 2014
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/15/14 ORDERING the Director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the trust account of Michael Lena and forward payment to the court until the balance is p aid in full. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit to the Director of the CDC; and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc CDC, Financial). (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?