Swanson-Houston, et al. v. Sutter County Superintendent of Schools, et al.
David Swanson and Heather Swanson-Houston |
Sutter County Superintendent of Schools, Yuba City Unified School District, Barbara Hickman and Bill Cornelius |
2:2014cv01431 |
June 16, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sutter |
Dale A. Drozd |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Civil Rights: Education |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/6/2017 GRANTING 61 Bill of Costs Submitted including defendants' request for reimbursement of $219.30 for the cost of the administrative transcript. (Washington, S) |
Filing 59 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/13/2016 GRANTING 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 44 Motion for Summary Judgment; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in favor of the defendants. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.) |
Filing 41 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/3/16: Discovery cut-off: July 22, 2016. Expert Disclosure: August 19, 2016. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: September 9, 2016. Expert Discovery cut-off: October 10, 2016. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 33 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/8/2015. On 6/18/2015, Court issued plaintiffs' counsel, Martha Millar, an 32 Order to Show Cause within 14 days as to why she should not be sanctioned for failing to appear at6/11/2015 Status Con ference. As of the date of this Order, counsel has not shown cause. Accordingly, Court is SANCTIONING plaintiffs' counsel in amount of $250. Counsel shall not relay this cost to her clients. Within 7 days of Order, counsel is ordered to remit payment and to file a Declaration so stating. Failure to comply will result in additional sanctions. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 32 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/18/15. Plaintiff's counsel shall show cause within 14 days as to why sanctions should not be issued in the amount of $250.00 for failing to appear at the 6/11/15 status conference. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/15/2015 ORDERING that Defendants' 17 Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike are DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs are directed to file an amended complaint withdrawing claims 4 through 6 and removing their preliminary statement, as stated in their opposition, within 21 days. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/1/14. Plaintiffs are directed to provide service documents to the USM and a statement with the court that documents were provided within 14 days. The USM is directed to serve process within 90 days. The Clerk shall send plaintiffs counsel one USM form, one summons, a copy of the complaint and this court's order setting status conference. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/30/2014 ORDERING 7 , 8 Both applications to Proceed informa pauperis are GRANTED and the case may proceed without payment of the filing fee; and Heather Swanson Houston is APPOINTED as Guardian Ad Litem for David Swanson. 4 (Reader, L) |
Filing 3 ORDER denying 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/23/14: Plaintiffs must file renewed requests to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the complete filing fee within twenty-one days of the date of this order; if they do not comply, the action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.