Salat v. Pirotto et al
| Imhotep Salat |
| Michael Pirotto and County of Sacramento |
| 2:2014cv01468 |
| June 19, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/15/2015 RECOMMENDING that defendant's 49 motion to dismiss be granted and the 45 complaint dismissed without leave to amend. Motion referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/17/15: Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint in accordance with the January 13, 2015, order and findings and recommendations 41 , within thirty (30) days of the service of this order. Plaintiff's request that the court waive PACER's usual fees 42 is DENIED. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/12/2015 ORDERING 41 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in FULL; Defendants' 24 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED without leave to amend.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/12/2015 GRANTING 24 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend as to (a) plaintiff's claims for violation of 42 USC 1983 based on this over-confinement, defendant s' failure to provide him with his arrest record, denial or medical services and failure to notify him that he was being investigated and (b) plaintiff's state law claims for kidnapping and false imprisonment. It is further ORDERED that Pla intiff's 30 motion for declaratory relief and 38 Motion for Sanction are DENIED. Defendants' 24 Motion for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 27 & 38 Motion for Judicial Notice are DENIED. The court will set a deadline f or plaintiff to file an amended complaint after the district judge rules on the findings and recommendations. Until that time, plaintiff should not file an amended complaint. It is hereby RECOMMENDED that the 24 Motion to Dismiss be granted without leave to amend as to plaintiff's claims for violation of the Federal Financial Privary Act. Referred to District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/14/14 VACATING 12 Motion to Dismiss and the 11/19/2014 Hearing and DENYING 21 Request to Appear Telephonically. Defendants are DIRECTED to file a responsive pleading or 12(b) motion within 21 days of this order. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/10/14 ORDERING that The 10/28/14, order to show cause, 14 , is DISCHARGED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/27/14. Mr. Pirotto shall either show good cause we he failed to waive service, or pay to the USM the costs of personal service and notify the court of such payment within 30 days. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/1/2014 GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's request to proceed IFP; Service is appropriate for defendants: Michael Pirotto, County of Sacramento. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith, and the US Marshal is directed to serve within 90 days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to FRCP 4, including a copy of this court's status order, without prepayment of costs. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 fo rm for each defendant, one summons, a copy of the complaint, an appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge, and this court's status order. Plaintiff is directed to supply the USM, within 15 days from the date this order is filed , all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM; The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
