Jamison v. YC Parmia Insurance Group et al
Plaintiff: Jeremy Jamison
Defendant: YC Parmia Insurance Group, Yolo County Sheriff's Department and - Whitehead
Case Number: 2:2014cv01710
Filed: July 21, 2014
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Yolo
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 58 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/23/16 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
January 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/25/16 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed December 9, 2015, are adopted in full; Defendants' motion to dismiss 21 is partially granted, and defendants Yolo County and YC Parma Insurance Group are dismissed; Defendant Whitehead's motion to dismiss is denied; and Within twenty-one days from the date of this order, defendant Whitehead shall file a responsive pleading. (Becknal, R)
December 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/9/2015 STRICKING plaintiff's 7/7/2015 surreply 52 . IT IS RECOMMENDED that defendants' 42 motion to dismiss be partially granted, and defendan ts Yolo County and YC Parma Insurance Group be dismissed; defendant Whitehead's motion to dismiss be denied; and within 21 days from any order adopting these recommendations, defendant Whitehead be directed to file a responsive pleading. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
June 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/25/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery (ECF No. 44 ) is denied without prejudice; Plaintiffs motion for production of documents (ECF No. 48 ) is denied without prejudice; Plaintiffs June 4, 2015 motion (ECF No. 45 ), construed as a request for default, is denied; and all discovery is stayed pending resolution of defendants motion to dismiss (ECF No. 42 ).(Dillon, M)
May 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/22/15 denying Motions to Appoint Counsel 34 , 41 . (Plummer, M)
January 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/6/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 19 motion for appointment of counsel, without prejudice. (Yin, K)
December 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/5/14 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff three blank USM-285 forms; and within 30 days, plaintiff shall submit to the court the completed USM-285 forms required to effect service. Failure to return the copies within the specified time period will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.(Dillon, M)
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Jeremy Jamison signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/26/2014. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/28/2014 ORDERING plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiffs failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. (Waggoner, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jamison v. YC Parmia Insurance Group et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeremy Jamison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: YC Parmia Insurance Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yolo County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: - Whitehead
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?