Crocker et al v. State of California, Department of Rehabilitation
| Gary Crocker and Thomas Evans |
| State of California, Department of Rehabilitation |
| 2:2014cv01944 |
| August 20, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Morrison C. England |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/6/15 DENYING AS MOOT 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and GRANTING 18 Motion to Dismiss. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER 22 continuing hearing date signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/18/2014. Motion Hearing is RE-SET for 1/8/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE). Plaintiffs' Opposition to defendant's 18 Motion to Dismiss 1 Complaint remaining due on 11/20/2014 and defendant's Reply remaining due on 11/27/2014. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/21/2014 DENYING 2 Motion for TRO without prejudice to refiling as a properly noticed Motion for a Preliminary Injunction in accordance with the FRCP and this Court's Local Rules. (Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
