Bischoff, et al v. Brittain, et al
Scott Bischoff and Leron Dempsey |
Sandra Brittain, Keith Johnson and RZM Investments Enterprise, LLC |
2:2014cv01970 |
August 25, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Housing/Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 176 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/26/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Sanctions 167 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 133 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/15/16 ORDERING that the court DENIES defendants' motion for reconsideration; DENIES plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment against Johnson and GRANTS it in all other regard s; and DENIES without prejudice plaintiffs' motion for attorney's fees and costs. The court OVERRULES as moot defendants' objection to plaintiffs' notice of recent consent judgment and attorney fee award 127 .The claims not res olved by this order are all of plaintiffs' claims against Johnson, plaintiffs' claim against all defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b) based on the allegedly discriminatory attempted eviction of Bischoff and Dempsey, and plaintiffs' claim against all defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 3617. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 130 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/12/16 ORDERING documents sealed. (Washington, S) Modified on 9/12/2016 (Washington, S). |
Filing 105 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/29/2016 GRANTING 47 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the liability of J.A. Brittain, Limited and RZM under 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b); GRANTING 75 Motion to Amend the First Amended Co mplaint; ORDERING the plaintiffs to file the proposed second amended complaint (ECF 75 ) as a separate document within fourteen (14) days; ORDERING the defendants to partially redact Dempsey's date of birth information contained in Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Sandra Brittain (ECF 61 ) within fourteen (14) days as required by Local Rule 140(a). (Michel, G.) |
Filing 83 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/9/16 ORDERING that No later than 3/4/2016, Defendants shall produce all discovery, without objection, required under the Court's 10/15/15 order (ECF No. 54 ) on Plaintiffs motion to comp el. The Motion for Sanctions 67 is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal after review by Plaintiff's Counsel of the further production called for in the instant order. No later than 2/19/16, Plaintiff's counsel shall submit a statement of the Attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the motion. No later than 2/26/16, Defendants may submit a response to the claimed Attorneys' fees.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 60 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/3/2015. Defendant's 59 Motion to Quash is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal in proper District. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 58 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/28/15. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 54 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/15/2015 ORDERING that the parties are directed to meet and confer regarding a stipulated protective order. No later than 10/28/2015, the parties shall submit a stipulated protective order. I f the parties cannot agree on the terms of the protective order, no later than 10/28/2015, plaintiffs shall submit a proposed protective order and defendants shall file any objections thereto. The 44 motion to compel is GRANTED. All responsive documents shall be produced, without objection, no later than 11/6/2015. Discovery produced pursuant to this order shall be subject to the protective order. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/5/15: This matter is referred to the court's ADR Coordinator, Sujean Park, for referral to VDRP for the convening of a VDRP session to occur by March 27, 2015, at which a principal with full settlement authority for each party shall appear. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 20 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/10/2014 GRANTING 4 Plaintiffs Motion for preliminary injunction; Defendants Sandra Brittain, Keith Johnson and RZM Investments Enterprise, LLC shall allow plaintiffs to remain in and use and enjoy the ir apartments at the Birchwood Gardens apartment complex, and shall not terminate plaintiffs Scott Bischoff's and Leron Dempsey's tenancies based on discriminatory reasons in violation of the FHA so long as plaintiffs continue to pay their monthly rent; Plaintiffs Scott Bischoff and Leron Dempsey shall continue to pay rent to defendants at the current monthly rate as the rent becomes due. Payment of rent shall be delivered to the on-site manager's office; this preliminary injunction will remain in effect until a final determination of plaintiffs' claims; no bond is required at this time. (Reader, L) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/29/2014, nunc pro tunc to the time of submission of the parties' stipulation, VACATING the hearing and briefing dates set in the 5 Minute Order; GRANTING IN P ART the plaintiffs' 4 Motion as to the Temporary Restraining Order; ALLOWING the plaintiffs to supplement their moving papers by 9/5/2014; ORDERING the defendants to file a memorandum in opposition to the 4 Motion as to the Preliminary Injun ction by 9/12/2014; ORDERING the plaintiffs to file any reply memorandum by 9/19/2014; SETTING the Motion Hearing on the 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction for 9/26/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; ORDERING that this order remain in effect until dissolved by the Court. (Michel, G) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.