Johnson v. Voss et al
| Scott Johnson |
| Louis H. Voss and Green Man Recycling, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv02021 |
| September 2, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/18/15: The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate plaintiff's motion to dismiss 5 . Ms. Hubinger is sanctioned in the amount of $150, which is intended to partially compensate plaintiff for the reasonable expenses incurred in appearing at the January 28, 2015 hearing. This sum shall be paid to plaintiff no later than 14 days from the date of this order. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/29/15: Defendant GMRI shall show cause, in writing, on or before February 4, 2015, why sanctions should not be imposed for its failure to appear at the January 28, 2015 hearing. HEARING as to 5 MOTION to QUASH reset for 2/11/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Show Cause Hearing reset for 2/11/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/29/2014 ORDERING that the hearing on defendant's 5 motion to quash is CONTINUED to 1/28/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Pl aintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than 1/14/2015, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, o r a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than 1/14/2015. Failure to file an opposition to the motion will be deemed a statement of nonopposition thereto, and may result in a recommendation that this this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and/or for failure to comply with court orders and this court's Local Rules. Defendant may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 1/21/2015. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
