Bennett et al v. Biotronik, Inc.
Plaintiff: Max Bennett
Defendant: Biotronik, Inc.
Intervenor_plaintiff: USA
Case Number: 2:2014cv02407
Filed: October 14, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/19/16 ORDERING Biotronik's supplemental brief, ECF No. 54 , is STRICKEN IN PART as described. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice and without leave to amend as to the federal claims under the False Claims Act. The motion is also GRANTED as to the remaining claims, but without prejudice to refiling in state court. This order resolves ECF No. 42 . CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)
September 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/3/15 ORDERING that Counsel, Charles Kester, shall immediately serve a copy of this order on Max Bennett. Mr. Kester shall also submit, in writing and for the Court's in camera review, specific reasons he believes withdrawal is necessary. He shall do so within seven days, and shall serve the same writing on Max Bennett by the same date, filing proof of service on the Court's docket.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
March 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/2/15 ORDERING that the complaint be unsealed and served upon the defendant by the relator. The seal be lifted as to all other matters occurring in this action after the date of this Order. The parties s hall serve all pleadings and motions filed in this action. The United States may order any deposition transcripts and is entitled to intervene in this action, for good cause, at any time. The parties shall serve all notices of appeal upon the United States. All orders of this Court shall be sent to the United States. Should the relator or the defendant propose that this action be dismissed, settled, or otherwise discontinued, the Court will provide the United States with notice and an opportunity to be heard before ruling or granting its approval. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bennett et al v. Biotronik, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Max Bennett
Represented By: Charles Forrest Kester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Biotronik, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor_plaintiff: USA
Represented By: Catherine J. Swann(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?