Smith v. Montgomery et al
Petitioner: Rayshawn Dontay Smith
Respondent: W. L. Montgomery and CDCR
Case Number: 2:2014cv02468
Filed: October 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 12/6/17, ORDERING that the Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. Smith's requests to conduct discovery in this case and for an evidentiary hearing and the appointment of counsel are DENIED. The Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate ofAppealability. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
May 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/26/2015 DENYING petitioner's 14 motion for reconsideration. (Yin, K)
May 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER denying 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/11/15. (Plummer, M)
April 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/16/2015 ORDERING petitioner may file, not more than 30 days, a second amended petition containing only exhausted claims; and petitioner's failure to timely file a second amended petition will result in dismissal of the petition without prejudice to re-filing if and when state remedies are exhausted as to all claims therein. (Yin, K)
December 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/10/14 granting 7 Motion for Extension of time. Petitioner is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an amended petition. Petitioner's motion to stay 8 is denied without prejudice to renewal. Petitioner may file a motion to stay along with any amended petition. (Plummer, M)
October 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/27/14 ORDERING that petitioner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; Petitioners application for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with leave to amend within thirty days from the date of this order; The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the courts form for application for writ of habeas corpus. (Dillon, M)
October 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the SACRAMENTO DIVISION of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/21/2014. (Sant Agata, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Montgomery et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rayshawn Dontay Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W. L. Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CDCR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?