Madkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Kimberly Y. Madkins |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2014cv02750 |
| November 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/27/16 ORDERING Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of $6,800.00. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff, to date, by counsel in connection with this civil action. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/24/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART. The Commissioner's 23 Motion to Remand is GRANTED. The matter is REMANDED for further considerations consistent with this order. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in plaintiff's favor. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/29/15: Defendant shall show cause, in writing, within fourteen days of the date of this order, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file a cross-motion for summary judgment. Defendant shall file her cross-motion for summary judgment within fourteen days of the date of this order. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/8/15 ORDERING that Defendant shall have a second extension of time of 30 days, nunc pro tunc, to respond to Plaintiff's MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The new deadline would be 10/26/2015.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/25/15 re: 16 APPROVING AND ORDERING defendant an extension of time of an additional 30 days to respond to plaintiff's opening brief. The new due date will be 9/25/15. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER 13 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/29/2015. Plaintiff's time to file Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED until 7/27/2015. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/24/14 GRANTING 3 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff shall submit documents for process to the USM within 14 days, and a statement with the court regarding submission. The USM shall serve process within 60 days. (Manzer, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Madkins v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kimberly Y. Madkins | |
| Represented By: | Jared Thomas Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
