Phelps v. Superior Court of California County of Solano et al
| Janet Denise Phelps |
| Superior Court of California County of Solano, Paul Beeman, State of California, First Appellate District Court of California, Kathleen M. Banke, James J. Marchiano, Sandra L. Margulies, Harry Misthos, David Timko, Linda LaSorsa and Law Firm of Timko & LaSorsa |
| 2:2014cv02794 |
| December 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Humboldt |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Morrison C. England |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending that action be dismissed without prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/17/2015. These Findings and Recommendations are SUBMITTED to District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Within 14 day after being served with these F & Rs, plaintiff may file written Objections with Court. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/30/15 ORDERING that. Plaintiff's Request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED; The complaint is DISMISSED, with leave to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight (28) days from the date of service of this Order. Plaintiff's Request for permission to use the court's electronic filing system, filed 12/1/14 3 , is DENIED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
