In re Armando E. Herrera
| Armando E. Herrera |
| 2:2014cv02939 |
| December 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Allison Claire |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/7/2016 ADOPTING IN FULL 43 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 38 Motion for TRO. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
45
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/29/16 recommending that respondent's motion to dismiss the petition 29 be granted and petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied as untimely. This court decline to issue a certificate of appealability. Motion to Dismiss 29 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/21/2016 DENYING petitioner's 42 motion for an extension of time to respond to respondent's motion to dismiss; and DENYING petitioner's 42 motion for appointment of counsel. IT IS RECOMMENDED that petitioner's 38 motion for a temporary restraining order be denied. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 21 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/15/15 ORDERING that Petitioner's requests for unspecified relief (ECF Nos. 32 , 36 ) are DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the prisoner complaint form used in this district.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/7/15 GRANTING 27 Motion for Extension of time. Respondent shall file a responsive pleading by August 20, 2015.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/12/15 ORDERING that 15 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED; Petitioner shall file an amended petition within 30 days from the date of this order.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/2/15 ORDERING that the letter filed on October 27, 2014, ECF No. 1 , is construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the docket accordingly; Pet itioners application for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with leave to amend within thirty days from the date of this order; Petitioners motion for extension, ECF. No. 6, is denied as moot; Petitioners November 14, 2014 request for appointmen t of counsel 6 is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings; Petitioners motion to proceed in forma pauperis, 9 , is granted; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the courts form for filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In re Armando E. Herrera | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Armando E. Herrera | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
