United States of America v. Approximately $67,646.00 in U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| Approximately $67,646.00 in U.S. Currency |
| Cedric Sewell |
| 2:2014mc00110 |
| September 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| William B. Shubb |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/14/15. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
6
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/5/2015 ORDERING the United States to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture by 3/6/2015. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
4
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/24/14 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture is EXTENDED to 1/6/2015. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
2
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/5/2014 EXTENDING time until 11/7/2014 to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency. (Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
