Barger v. Hirsch et al
| Gary Dale Barger |
| David Hirsch, Ventura Superior Court, OPS, CDCR, Ventura Police Department Chief, San Bernardino County Sheriff Department and Ventura County Sheriff Department |
| 2:2015cv00224 |
| January 27, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/24/2015 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/22/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 9 application to proceed IFP; plaintiff shall submit the appropriate fee of $400.00, within 21 days. Plaintiff's failure to timely comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/7/15 ORDERING Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2 ) is dismissed without prejudice; The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
