Sexton v. State of California
| Patricia D. Sexton |
| State of California |
| 2:2015cv00542 |
| March 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER adopting in full 10 the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 10/30/15. Plaintiff's 9 amended complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending plaintiff's 9 First Amended Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend, signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/22/2015. These Findings & Recommendations are SUBMITTED to District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Within 21 days after being served with these F & Rs, plaintiff may file written Objections with Court. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/01/15 ORDERING that the 4 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. Plaintiff must file an amended complaint within 20 days. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/12/2015 ORDERING that plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/20/15 ORDERING that: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is granted; Plaintiff's complaint 1 is dismissed; and Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the dat e of service of this order to file an amended complaint that complies with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice; the amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned this case and must be labeled "Amended Complaint"; plaintiff must file an original and two copies of the amended complaint; failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sexton v. State of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patricia D. Sexton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
