Martin v. Town of Paradise et al
| Richard S. Martin |
| Town of Paradise and Paradise Police Department |
| 2:2015cv00594 |
| March 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Butte |
| Allison Claire |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/11/2016 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's orders pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(b), E.D. Cal. R 110; REFERRING this matter to Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING that any objections be filed within twenty-one (21) days. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/18/16 ORDERING the courts 2/24/16 initial scheduling conference VACATED until further notice and Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing within 14 days of the date of this order why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/8/2015 ORDERING the defendants to file and serve a responsive motion or pleading within twenty-one (21) days; SETTING a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference for 2/24/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire; ORDERING the parties to file a status report fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/26/15 ORDERING that the previously set deadlines for filing of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, Defendants Town of Paradise and Paradise Police Department's responsive pleading; and the parties' exchange of initial disclosures are hereby SUSPENDED until after the Court's determination of Plaintiff's current counsels' motion to withdraw. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 06/01/15 ORDERING that the First Amended Complaint is due by 6/26/2015; the Law Office of Douglas R. Thorn shall accept and waive service on behalf of any named defendants who are employees of the Town of Paradise or Paradise Police Dept; defendants shall file their responsive pleading by 07/24/15; parties agree to exhange initial disclosures by 07/10/15. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/30/2015 ORDERING 11 the Amended Complaint is due by 5/29/2015; and defendants named in the First Amended Complaint, represented by the Law Office of Douglas R. Thorn shall file with the Court a responsive pleading on or before 6/19/2015. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
10
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/21/2015 ORDERING 9 that the default of defendants as to Paradise Police Department and Town of Paradise, entered by the Clerk of the Court on 4/10/2015 7 , shall be set aside; Plaintiff sha ll file with the Court a first amended complaint by 5/1/2015; the Law Office of Douglas R. Thorn, shall accept and waive service of process on behalf of any named defendants who are employees of defendants named in plaintiff's first amended complaint; defendants shall file a responsive pleading to the first amended complaint on or before 5/15/2015.(Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
