W. C. v. Placer Hills Unified School District, et al
Plaintiff: W. C.
Defendant: Placer Hills Unified School District and Steve Schaumleffel
Case Number: 2:2015cv00716
Filed: March 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/15/2016 ORDERING that docket entries 24 (Memorandum by W.C. in Support of Motion to Approve Minor's Settlement), 25 (Declaration of Jay T. Jambeck in Support of Motion to Approve Minor's Settlement) and 26 (Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Approve Minor's Settlement) are SEALED pursuant to local rule 141. (Zignago, K.)
November 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/17/2016 GRANTING Plaintiff's 23 Motion to Approve Minor's Settlement. (Jackson, T)
August 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/16/16 ORDERING that the Expert Discovery shall be EXTENDED to 9/30/2016 and the deadline for supplemental expert disclosure shall be EXTENDED to 10/20/2016. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
June 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/24/16 ORDERING that the non-expert discovery deadline shall be EXTENDED to 8/30/2016 for the purpose of taking the FRCP 30(b)(6) deposition noticed by Plaintiff for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Stipulation. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
February 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/18/2016 ORDERING that discovery be completed by 6/27/2016; ORDERING that expert witnesses be disclosed by 8/30/2016 and that supplemental expert witnesses be disclosed by 9/20/2016; O RDERING that dispositive motions be filed by 12/8/2016; ORDERING that the joint final pretrial conference statement be filed by 3/2/2017; CONTINUING the Final Pretrial Conference to 3/9/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; CONTINUING the Jury Trial 3/15/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Michel, G.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: W. C. v. Placer Hills Unified School District, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: W. C.
Represented By: Jay T. Jambeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Placer Hills Unified School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Schaumleffel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?